Social Networking Government Censorship


CIA Behind A U.S Meth Contra?


CIA Behind 2012 French Presidential Coup

FollowShare on Tumblr “A Turkish newspaper urged that the United States be listed in Guinne

What Is Europe’s Problem?

FollowShare on Tumblr ‎” It starts with “thou shall not kill”, then it is “

The Truth About Ron Paul

FollowShare on Tumblr WARNING: Due to the Highly Controversial Nature of this article, it is recomme

A Conversation With The Renown Noam Chomsky About 9/11

FollowShare on Tumblr A Conversation With The Renown Noam Chomsky: The Truth Movement and Sept. 11 A

2014 – Biggest Genocide In Human History

FollowShare on Tumblr Every 5 years the global elite has starved to death approx. 54,750,000 people

Rich Americans Are Being Armed

FollowShare on Tumblr Rich americans are being armed and trained to kill poor people, in order to mo

Free Energy Suppression

FollowShare on Tumblr According to Wikipedia: “Free energy suppression (sometimes new energy


Social Networking Government Censorship

April 1, 2013 in Uncategorized


WARNING: Due to the highly controversial nature of this article, it is recommended that you do not read this article, if you have a hard time accepting original ideas. The truth can hurt you, but it can also set you free:

CensorshipIn 2001 when 9/11 happened, the world was in shock and the people did not know how to react, much less suspect it had been orchestrated by the CIA. And when the Iraq war happened, everyone trusted President Bush enough to go into Iraq to get those WMDs that were never found. Yet the whole time, no one had been prepared for the huge psychological warfare operations the Bush Administration was putting in place. Yes, a lot of people called George Bush a fascist, but not much else could be heard. No one mentioned that his grandfather had helped fund Hitler (1), or that his father was still being regularly briefed about new CIA operations and old. And if there was it was marginalized and acclaimed as conspiracy theories, by even George Bush himself. Then, somehow the Patriot act came out from nowhere, as if it had been writ overnight, and in came the Department of Homeland Security (a modern version of Gestapo) as well as Guantanamo (which was even more curious seeing as how we hadn’t trusted the Cubans in over 50 years). And again the people bowed down and did not question.

YouTube Preview Image

Now in 2013, we finally have all the facts, and this is how it goes:

2003: Bush Administration monitors anarchist groups in the U.S (Reported by Michael Moore)

2004: Facebook is created with CIA money and U.S Military backing (2). Facebook was originally conceived as a sexist and elitist Harvard tool to rate who was “Hot or Not” .

2006: Oracle billionaire Larry Ellison worked on a CIA project with the code-name “Oracle” (over 3 billion devices use Java by Oracle) (3)

2007: Palantir (officially) starts creating online censorship software for the U.S Military (4), when reports dating back to 2004 state that the Department of Homeland Security had hired up to 50,000 agents to monitor the internet.

2009: FOIA Documents Reveal DHS Social Media Monitoring During Obama Inauguration (5)

2011: Many complaints from anti-war activists and non-profits about censorship start to arise. (6) (7) (8)

2011: get $15 million donation from Palantir. (9)

2012: Project Censored puts “US Military Manipulates the Social Media” at #2 (10) on their most censored list (Operation Earnest Voice mentioned), with More US Soldiers Committed Suicide Than Died in Combat as #1.

This was our icon on Facebook for over 2 years, and Facebook recently deleted it saying it was breaching their terms of engagement. If it is, that means that Facebook's terms of engageement are against freedom of speech.

This was our icon on Facebook for over 2 years, and Facebook recently deleted it saying it was breaching their terms of engagement. If it is, that means that Facebook’s terms of engageement are against freedom of speech.

Now this might all seem pretty abstract to you, but let me put it into perspective now that you have the timeline. The U.S Military thanks to Operation Earnest Voice had the capability to censor Iraqi activists, as well as journalists all over the world working for big publications (with close affiliations to the CIA). Which means that the effects of these psychological operations caused something like this: “When the war ended with tens of thousands Iraqi dead and an electricity and sanitation supply deliberately “bombed into the stone age”, the west followed up with sanctions. It is now estimated by the UN that these sanctions, which have prevented repairs to sewage and water plants on the one hand and denied basic medicines/food supplies on the other, have been responsible for the deaths of around one million people, many of them children. Other sources put this figure at 1.5 to 2 million.” (11)

There had been rumors that the Bush Administration had lied about the number of casualties, only counting those actively killed by U.S Soldiers, and not those who died from lack of basic necessities. And to think that meanwhile the U.S Military and CIA were developing software to be used in our homeland, by Homeland Security still to this day seems surreal. Not to mention that the CIA would rig elections for George Bush and Obama (who had worked for CIA front companies in the past, and whose mother was an advocate for the IMF’s devastating free-market capitalist policies, in countries like Chile under Pinochet).

As an internet activist and founder of an anarchist non-profit, I have been attacked, harassed, and censored by the U.S Military since 2009 (when my non-profit was still a blog gaining a large audience). Our members and volunteers have also encountered the same issues. One volunteer was even given death threats by an angry U.S soldier who lost composure while attacking us with fake personas. And a teenage member’s parents were questioned by the FBI for their son visiting our Facebook page. We also had a member who I have not heard of since, who set up an Occupy protest in front of Facebook Headquarters in Palo Alto, and was censored on Facebook. Therefore only 12 people came to her event. At the event they were met immediately by Palo Alto police, who apparently were very violent and put our volunteer into a coma. All attempts since by our non-profit to expose this were “astroturfed” by Google and Facebook. Our website has since been under continuous DoS attacks ever since by government hackers. And our Paypal account was immediately shut down by Paypal. Last month Facebook shut down our page for over 6 out of 30 days, with no reason, and activated it again when too many people started asking questions about us (we have a very small but strong group of supporters and volunteers on Facebook, whom have been endlessly persecuted by “CIA Facebook”). We even set up a social network on our website which was compromised and hacked into. And many anti-war activists are reporting similar damages. Even lawyers are getting hard to find in order to demand retribution, since no lawyer likes going up against the United States Government.

The numbers are still not clear, but the U.S Military has definitely been censoring millions of anti-war voices and even “impeach Bush” voices since 2004(12). And we now know that Google was working with the U.S Military prior to the creation of Facebook. Nothing more than a great National Socialist PR campaign, with merchandising, lots of censorship and a global pro-capitalist police state set up. When we cannot forget that the United States since World War 2 has killed more people for the same corporations and banks who funded Nazis all over Europe, the business plan (Investigated by a Rockefeller) and continued through the CIA since 1947 (13). These are the same people who funded General Franco and went to his funeral (funeral attended by Rockefellers), as well as those who funded King Constantine and the Shah of Iran. Not to mention that these are also the same people who murdered and censored European anarchists and after world war 2, and even before world war 2 in the U.S.

U.S ElectionsAfter the French revolution, the working class demanded that anarchists be (left) and hierarchists be (right), this idea was obscured with communism and socialism which were hierarchist systems (systemically fascist), and would later murder anarchists and jail them in gulags, just like the fascists in Europe with concentration camps. In other words what can be called the perpetual and conscientious culling of the masses by the ruling class. “Taking out the weeds”. And as it so turns out, I recently discovered that the Swastika was chosen by the Nazis, because it represented the brutal caste system in India, which for thousands of years has ritualized the murdering of lower castes by upper castes as a divine right (14).

We are right in the middle of global class warfare being played out by the 1% who own over 60% of this planet’s wealth and assume none of the responsibilities. The 1% (about 10 million millionaires and billionaires) who pollute our planet, allow 16,000 children a day to die from starvation, and millions to die from toxic products in their environments, which were originally sold for quick profit. We are being run by a bunch of lunatics who have covered our planet with nuclear bombs and proxy wars, ordain that this perpetually hierarchist system is flawless, and that mass slavery and servitude are inevitable. But in reality, it goes against thousands of years of collective history. To try and go against 6 billion people today is absolute folly. And if they succeed, their empire will eventually fall to barbarism and feudalism just like every empire in the past. Then this planet will be remembered as nothing more than a shooting star, which crashed because the pilots thought they were too divine to share shifts and/or profits.



1. “George Bush’s grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany. The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.”
















CIA Behind A U.S Meth Contra?

June 13, 2012 in Uncategorized


There is not a more destructive drug out on the market than crystal meth, not something new, I am sure you have heard this before.

Newport Beach Where Andrea Nelson Was Murdered, 20 Years Old

The U.S Government has a long history of funding and supporting the distribution of illegal drugs, in order to fund right-wing fascist activities such as war operations, all around the world, since the Vietnam War, at least. From cocaine to crack cocaine, and from LSD to heroin, by golly, the U.S Government has helped sell and fund them all.  And what better drug than crystal meth? You can make it on U.S territory. And it even gets people motivated to work, so that they can buy more drugs. What do I have to support these claims?

Well the U.S Government insurged a capitalist coup in China, in the 90’s, so that corporations like Nike and Microsoft,  could enslave the chinese people for more profit, while on the international level, just like Russia after CIA Putin, continued to make threats. No better enemy to make threats at than a cloaked friend. And then China became suddenly addicted to crystal meth towards the end of the 1990’s. Working class men and women, working for corporations who needed some sort of stimulus, started buying Batu (crystal meth). It became a big city epidemic.

There was also under the Obama administration, Operation Fast and Furious, which involved the ATF providing mexican drug cartels with automatic weapons. Call me a conspiracist, but those guns went on to kill a lot of poor mexicans, for drugs America could have grown for free! So now please indulge me by reading this little story, which was shared by a mother who has lived through terrible terrible agony, and lost a daughter, because of the corruptness of the U.S Illegal drug market, as well as capitalism in general:

Homayan “Ray” Bakhtar

Jan. 27, 2003, Andrea Nelson 20 years old, at New Port Beach Harbour, is drugged, raped, allegedly videotaped “snuff”, killed and brought to the hospital dead. Homayan “Ray” Bakhtar, said he had consensual sex with Andrea, and that she had died naturally from a drug over-dose. Now I don’t know if the name caught your attention but Bakhtar is an arab name. I traced the name back to Iran (Bakhtar’s father was a high ranking Iranian official, and Johar has since moved to Dubai). But this seemed very strange to me, I know America is the land of equal opportunity and all (yeah right), but still. Wouldn’t be the first time the CIA hires foreigners to do the dirty work in America. In any case, Andrea had been a witness in an investigation involving her boyfriend Sammy Johar (bing another arab name), and had identified meth labs, drugs, prostitution ring, and police corruption (Tustin Police Department as well other U.S Government Agents), all under the front of a strip club, to law enforcement. Bakhtar and Johar knew each other. Johar probably worked under Bakhtar playing the sugar daddy for strippers, who were being prostituted, as well as used to sell narcotics. So the main theory is that Bakhtar was told by corrupt government officials, to kill Andrea, who had witnessed their whole operation.

Linda Cator points to where her daughter was murdered

On the night of Andrea’s death, she had been witnessed 2 hours earlier completely sober, and later the police investigation revealed wrong doing: “The bruises could clearly be seen around the neck, wrist and ankles when the photographs are blown up 300 percent. “ And even worse: “According to details supplied to this reporter, Andrea Nelson died while Homayan Ray Bakhtar videotaped his rape of the decedent, Andrea Nelson, resulting in the filming of a pornographic ‘snuff film.'”

Johar left the country, and Bakhtar stayed to slander Andrea’s mother: “Cator is pursuing conspiracy theories instead of coming to terms with her own failings as a mother.” Andrea died in Bakhtar’s multi-million dollar house (video), and there are many discrepancies in his official statement, stating for instance, that he had no relation with Andrea’s sugar daddy Johar.

What makes this case even stranger, is that police officers were used to transport these stripper/drug dealing/prostitutes, and doing security for the strip club. And as you can see in that video, the part of the house where Andrea was allegedly raped, was professionally stripped of any physical proof of the murder. Photos of the house show that violence had been commited, as well as discovery of GHB, inside the house. No autopsy was conducted, and every attempt by Andrea’s mother Linda Cator in seeking justice, has been denied; even after having spent more than $60,000 in legal fees, and having been addressed incompetent lawyers to solve her case. Here is Linda’s full statement, as there is no better fiction, than truth:

August 9, 2010

Office of the Chief Trial Counsel/Intake
The State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles, California 90015-2299
(213) 765-1000

all about crystal meth abuseTo Whom It May Concern,
My name is Linda Cator and I am the mother of a murdered daughter, Andrea Nelson. I am writing this letter to inform you and to document the unethical practices and abuses I suffered by three professionals hired to represent me in a wrongful death lawsuit
while seeking Justice for my daughter’s murder. Attorney Norman Gregory Fernandez, Private Investigator Scott Shaw and Attorney Len Chaitin were retained by me in the course of the case of wrongful death filed on behalf of my daughter, Andrea Nelson. This
letter will provide a brief accounting of the circumstances surrounding my daughter, Andrea Nelson, her rape and murder, followed by a discourse of the intentional, deceptive tactics and the ongoing and residual damage the above named professionals
inflicted upon my family and I.

On the night of January 27, 2003, my daughter, Andrea Nelson was taken to Hoag Hospital in Newport Beach, Ca. With no pulse, cold to the touch and in a comatose state, it became apparent that she had already expired. She was driven to the hospital in her
own car by a much older man, Homayan Bakhtar. Because Mr. Bakhtar told the hospital staff that he had had sex with Andrea earlier that night, a ludicrous proposition, the hospital refused to do a rape kit. Mr. Bahktar’s home was searched, at which time GHB,
amphetamine paraphernalia and marijuana were found. Andrea had left our home approximately 2 hours earlier, completely sober. However, her death was immediately labeled as a drug overdose. No drugs or paraphernalia of any kind was found on her
person or in her vehicle, nor did Andrea have any sort of criminal record. Prior to this night, Andrea had been an informant for the police in several cities and her name as such was released to the public just hours before her death. The details of the investigation
into her death are available at any time.

Late in 2005, I met with Attorney Norman Gregory Fernandez at the firm in which he was employed seeking help with the wrongful death of my daughter Andrea. Initially the Firm declined the case. The following day I received a phone call from Mr.
Fernandez who offered to quit his job at the Law Firm and take my case on full time with the condition that I also hire his Private Investigator, Scott Shaw. Prior to this, I had been in pro per. I met with both Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Shaw and my witness; they both expressed their eagerness to work on my daughter’s case. Welcoming the opportunity to retain help with Andrea’s case, I entered into a contract with Mr. Fernandez agreeing to pay his fee at $100.00 an hour. At no time did I enter into any contract with Mr.Shaw; however it was my understanding that Mr. Shaw would also be working on my daughter’s case. A second attorney, Mr. Len Chaitin, recommended by Mr. Fernandez, was retained and is named in this complaint. Mr. Fernandez explained that Mr. Chaitin would assist him as well with the case.

Record of Unethical Practices and Abuses:

During the time Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Shaw represented me in the wrongful death lawsuit for my murdered daughter, Andrea Nelson, several instances of the Attorney/Client confidentiality were violated and other abuses were intentionally inflicted upon me.

Mr. Fernandez insisted I allow Mr. Shaw to investigate my case. During the course of Mr. Shaw’s investigation, Private Investigator Shaw began providing me with details relative to my case that were clearly untrue. For example, Mr. Shaw related to me
that my niece and witness for Andrea’s case had been beaten up and was in a coma. Mr. Shaw advised me that I should in no way attempt to contact my niece or her family. This was of course completely false. Mr. Shaw at that time refused to discuss my daughter’s
case with me, which resulted in several meetings and many very long phone calls. I discussed these and other allegations regarding Mr. Shaw at length with my attorney, Mr. Fernandez. It was my request that Mr. Shaw be dismissed from the case. Mr. Fernandez
refused. At a later date, the following website was discovered revealing Mr. Shaw’s unethical practices. (

After my daughter was murdered, I chose to hire an independent Pathologist, Dr. Harry Bonnell, who reached a different conclusion as to the cause of my daughter’s death. Dr. Bonnell, an expert witness for San Diego District Attorney’s Office, was willing to be an expert witness for my case at no charge. When I approached Mr. Fernandez regarding Dr. Bonnell, Mr. Fernandez advised me against using Dr. Bonnell’s findings and testimony and informed me that I must hire a different pathologist John C. Hiserodt Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Phone: (714) 969-5291), at the cost of $1500. However Mr. Fernandez further advised me I could not have any contact with him. I did as Mr. Fernandez advised and paid the $1500 Mr. Hiserodt after which I received no report as to his findings and he did not testify at trial.

A journalist, who had followed the death of my daughter and had written 5 stories in the OC Weekly, contacted me informing me that he was requesting a meeting with me privately regarding Investigator Shaw. We made a date for lunch for the following Monday. On Sunday evening, Mr. Fernandez contacted me. Invoking my attorney client privilege, I told him about the lunch appointment. I appealed to him not to relate that I had made an appointment with the journalist. Violating Attorney/Client privilege and
against my express request to keep the meeting confidential, Mr. Fernandez provided Mr. Shaw with the meeting details. The following morning the journalist called me and cancelled our meeting because Mr. Shaw called him revealing that he, Mr. Shaw was privy to our meeting. After that the journalist refused to speak to me ever again and never wrote another article.

Investigator Shaw began to tell me that Attorney; Mr. Fernandez had been exhibiting bizarre behaviors. He inferred that Mr. Fernandez was making pornographic films. Mr. Shaw gave me a website to verify this called “The Adventures of Storm,
(Mr. Fernandez) and Spanky”. Web address listed below. At this time Mr. Shaw also informed me that Mr. Fernandez was possibly using crack. I again requested that Mr. Fernandez fire Mr. Shaw. Again, Mr. Fernandez refused to do so.

At Mr. Fernandez’ request, I began therapy sessions deemed important in proving the damages to my case. Approximately 2 years later, during a deposition in Los Angeles, California, opposing counsel asked if I was in therapy. I responded that yes I had been in
therapy. At break, Mr. Fernandez screamed at me for answering the attorney honestly. He stated that he feared that the records of my therapy would be subpoenaed. Subsequently, much of my therapy consisted of issues brought on by both my attorney, Mr. Fernandez
and P.I. Mr. Shaw, regarding the abuses I was suffering at their hands. This is well documented.

Over the approximately three and one-half years that Mr. Fernandez represented me, I repeatedly requested monthly statements showing the details of what I was being billed for. In response, I received e-mails from Mr. Fernandez which contained invoices
on which he wrote abusive notes. On the invoices were written words such as, “looney” and calling me “crazy”. I refused to pay invoices with such abusive comments and requested him to reword such invoices. He refused to send any other invoices to me.

I had asked Mr. Fernandez, in confidence that I did not wish to know the details of my daughter, Andrea’s death, unless it was absolutely necessary and pertinent to my case. During a break at one of my many day long depositions, Mr. Fernandez
insisted that he had to tell me the brutal details of my daughter’s rape, torture and murder. I again implored him to not reveal this information to me. Mr. Fernandez continued to insist I had to know. Standing in a parking lot Mr. Fernandez outlined the
details as follows: several men dragged my daughter (with a towel wrapped around her neck) upstairs at the defendant’s home, beat her, tied her to a bed, raped her while strangling her, then shot her with cocaine to revive her, and further strangled and raped
her. He also went on to claim that a snuff film had been made of her murder. And that the eye witness to the murder was beaten senseless with a baseball bat and would not be able to testify. Mr. Fernandez said the photos showed bruises from the ties around her wrists, ankles, and neck, bruises on her hand, blood in her nose, and blood on her hands as well as the mattress. While Mr. Fernandez told me these things, my girlfriend who had accompanied me to the deposition was crying, begging Mr. Fernandez not to tell me
these details. I collapsed in the parking lot. Mr. Fernandez left. After this event, I obtained a signed agreement from Mr. Fernandez that henceforth he would handle potentially-traumatizing conversations with my husband.


During one deposition it was revealed that yet another confidential statement I
had made to Mr. Fernandez regarding the recent death of my nephew to my complete
shock, opposing council brought up the subject of my nephew’s death which was
irrelevant to my case and clearly violated my Attorney/Client privilege.

During a conversation I had with Mr. Fernandez, Mr. Fernandez informed me that
he and Mr. Shaw were members of a motorcycle club and that he, Mr. Fernandez,
represented the Hell’s Angels. Mr. Shaw confirmed this and added that he, Mr. Shaw had
personally recruited Mr. Fernandez. Fernandez as well sent me emails of pictures of him
verifying what he had told me about. Later, when Mr. Fernandez became abusive to me, I
remembered his associations with the Hell’s Angels and the Motor Cycle Club causing
me to fear for my own safety.

At several different depositions during break, Mr. Fernandez acted
inappropriately, asking 3 different friends of mine who accompanied me, to feel his
muscles, as he bragged about his chest and arms.

The next section of this letter establishes the Record of Unethical Practices and Abuses
by Attorney Len Chaitin:

After several depositions, and a few years of Andrea’s case being delayed and
postponed, and my repeated requests that we move on to trial, the following events
occurred. Mr. Fernandez informed me that P. I. Shaw had been found guilty of perjury in
another case and therefore would not be testifying at Andrea’s trial. A few weeks later,
Mr. Fernandez phoned me and informed me that his doctor had assigned him to complete
bed rest and that he could no longer practice law. He advised me of my options, those
being that I could go pro per, find another attorney, or go with his recommendation. He
recommended Attorney Len Chaitin and informed me that Mr. Chaitin was quite familiar
with my case as Mr. Fernandez had been consulting Mr. Chaitin throughout the case. I
informed Mr. Fernandez that I preferred that he, Mr. Fernandez, remain on the case. He
replied, “Fuck You” and hung up on me. He then called my husband, Andrew Cator, and
notified my husband that he, Mr. Fernandez, would transfer the balance of $20,000, held
in trust for my case to Attorney Len Chaitin. This phone call would be our last contact
with Attorney Fernandez and Investigator Shaw.

A short time later, I contacted Mr. Chaitin, who assured me that he was up to date
on Andrea’s wrongful death case. He informed me that I would be deposed twice more.
At the first scheduled deposition, he instructed me to bring a box of personal records
mentioned at a prior date. Attorney Mr. Chaitin did not show up for the deposition but
sent another attorney to represent me. This substitute attorney turned over everything in
the box, including original copies of documents that to date have never been returned,
to opposing counsel. During a break, I told this substitute attorney that there was a
personal and confidential document in the box, protected by Attorney/Client privilege
that he shouldn’t have given opposing counsel. The substitute attorney began crying and


called Attorney Mr. Chaitin. Mr. Chaitin arrived reassuring me that it would be fine for
opposing counsel to have the information. Mr. Chaitin left, and the substitute attorney
and I returned to the deposition.

Prior to the next deposition, I implored my Attorney, Mr. Chaitin, to attend and
represent me. Instead, he sent yet another substitute attorney. Although I am the victim
in this scenario and have never been a witness to any crime but for facts revealed in the
investigation, opposing counsel proceeded to speak to me in a loud and abusive manner.
When opposing counsel continued with this line and tone of questioning, my substitute
attorney confronted opposing counsel. Opposing counsel then demanded that I say
whether or not I believed in God. When I refused, my substitute attorney stopped the
deposition and would not allow any more depositions. He said there was no reason for me
to be put through these kinds of depositions. When we left, he told me he had never in
his career seen anything like what had just happened.

Over the one and one-half years Mr. Chaitin was retained by me, I repeatedly
requested a meeting with Mr. Chaitin. Every request for a meeting was denied.

On the Thursday before trial was to begin, Mr. Chaitin told me that the first two days
of trial would be jury selection. The next evening, after court was closed, Mr. Chaitin
phoned me, informing me that he had waived jury trial, telling me that the trial would be
handled by the Judge. I informed Mr. Chaitin that a trial by Judge was not acceptable,
that I had been guaranteed a jury trial by both Mr. Fernandez as well as himself; I indeed
wanted a jury trial. Mr. Chaitin informed me that it was too late to change this, and he
had the Judge’s sympathy.

On the morning of trial, Mr. Chaitin refused to talk with me. Mr. Chaitin subpoenaed
no witnesses on behalf of my case, though two of my daughter’s friends were credible
witnesses who were at the defendant’s house just one week prior to the night of my
daughter’s murder. Neither were any Police Officers, my daughter’s bosses and
associates from work, any and all doctors, anyone from Orange Coast College where
Andrea attended as a full time student nor her dentist, who had treated Andrea the very
afternoon of the evening Andrea was murdered, were called to the trial. Mr. Chaitin
did not submit into evidence my daughter’s own writings relevant to the case. Further,
Mr. Chaitin did not submit any medical reports which were pertinent to the wrongful
death claim. I was never questioned on the stand as to being the last person with her
just two hours before her death. While I was on the stand, the confidential document
mentioned previously was used as opposing counsel’s line of questioning. I finally had
no choice than to make objection to this question while on the stand. The judge finally
agreed to hear me out and “my objection” was sustained. Although I was questioned
regarding the depositions I had made. I had never received the depositions to review,
correct or approve. Opposing counsel entered a photo into evidence that had never been
disclosed during discovery. When Mr. Chaitin did not object, I objected a second time.
Mr. Chaiten then removed me from my own trial. I was never even given an opportunity
to be prepped for the trial of my life. My trial lasted altogether approx. 1 hour. No jury


trial, no witness and no evidence were presented on behalf of my daughter. Two of my
daughter’s friends were in the courtroom to watch. Mr. Chaitin called them to witness
even though he hadn’t met with them or prepared them as witnesses. He asked them no
questions that would have brought forth answers incriminating to the defendant. Instead,
he made them look foolish. The defendant never even took the stand.

Mr. Chaitin’s questioning of a police officer who was there as a witness for the
defendant included no questions in which the answers would have incriminated the
defendant. I.E., he asked no questions that would have revealed that two bottles of GHB
cocaine –amphetamine paraphernalia, and marijuana were collected from the defendant’s
home. Also found in the defendants home was a video tape apparatus and lighting over
the bed. No questions were asked that might explain the items collected from the
defendant’s home. Further, Mr. Chaitin asked the officer no questions about the bloody
sheets, mattress, or the bruises or ligature marks that Mr. Fernandez had told me about
All of this information and witness testimony would have been crucial evidence that my
daughter had been murdered justifying a wrongful death claim.

After trial, I expressed my distress to Mr. Chaitin about his lack of knowledge
regarding the facts demonstrated at trial. He answered me by stating, “I never believed
that man had anything to do with the death of your daughter,” and walked away leaving
all of us standing in complete shock. Surly this disclosure, the fact that he didn’t believe
my daughter was murdered led him to mishandle what happened at trial. If I had been
informed of his opinion, I would certainly have chosen other representation.

A few months later, Mr. Chaitin notified me that he had to appeal the case or the
defendant could sue me. I asked him to bring to the Appeal my entire file. Instead, he
brought a large portrait of my daughter, made and mounted for her funeral. The portrait
was water damaged, warped, and ripped. It caused me severe emotional distress that
these two attorneys had cared so little for my daughter they hadn’t even protected this
special portrait of my beautiful daughter, a cost of almost $300.00 to replace. A portrait
left in the trunk of his car for almost two years, showing no care was taken in regards to
my property.

My husband made several appointments during the following months to pick up my
entire file from Mr. Chaitin. He told my husband that we would need a truck to retrieve
our file, it was that large. At least four times, Mr. Chaitin cancelled these appointments
the night preceding. He finally had my husband pick up the records, but a great deal of
the file was missing. None of P. I. Shaw’s private investigative work was included. None
of the substantial Coroners records, including all Coroner photos were included in the
file. Mr. Chaitin returned did not even return to me many of my depositions which as
I stated before, were not given to me to review at any time, He included in the records
about 25 unopened Fed Ex packages from opposing counsel, proving that he and Mr.
Fernandez did not review this information from opposing counsel. All of my attorneys’
correspondence with opposing counsel was missing. Nothing that I turned over to Mr.
Fernandez which was a good box or two was returned. My trial transcripts are missing.


Included in the materials Mr.Chaitin gave my husband him were: numerous
documents from other people’s cases, many of Mr. Chaitin’s bank statements and
personal letters, several depositions stamped “original” from other people’s cases, a thick
murder investigation on another case and a well-used Hustler Magazine.

I sent a certified letter to Mr. Chaitin informing him that he did not return the
entire contents of my case file and neglected to provide a statement of his costs. In the
letter I requested that he do both. The letter came back to me stamped “Not Able to

During the time Mr. Chaitin represented me, I repeatedly asked him for monthly
statements. To date, he has never provided me any statements showing costs, etc.

In Summary:

Not only did I have to deal with the trauma and grief of my daughter’s brutal
murder and unexpected premature death, Attorneys Fernandez and Chaitlin and Private
Investigator Shaw caused me additional emotional trauma and grief by their failures to
abide by numerous Rules of Professional Conduct. I paid these two attorneys and the PI.
Approximately $150,000.00————- over the course of approximately 5 years. Mr.
Fernandez gave me statements with emotionally and mentally abusive notes in them.
Mr. Chaitin never gave me any financial statement. No one has given me a financial
statement outlining any payments made to Mr. Shaw, the pathologist Mr. Hiserodt, or any
other varied and numerous costs. My property has been mishandled and to date has not
been returned. My attorney client conversations were shared with opposing counsel.
Mr. Fernandez even cashed a check from opposing counsel meant for me for production

I was promised a jury trial, by both Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Chaiten. My
relationship with a journalist was destroyed because my attorney breeched my
confidentiality by discussing a personal conversation.

48 Hours Mystery was going to film our trial and cover the entire case. They
flew producers from New York to interview my husband and I. The following day they
interviewed Private Investigator Shaw and Attorney Fernandez. After interviewing these
two individuals, they cancelled their project and left. Subsequent phone calls I made to
question what had happened were refused.

The emotional stress caused by the death of my daughter was only the beginning
of the trauma and pain my family and I have endured. The details of my daughters final
hours were something I never wanted to know. Attorney Fernandez had no regard for
requests that he not provide me with those details, recounting murder of my daughter in
explicit detail. I have been and will always be haunted by those words and the visions
such knowledge has conjured in my mind.


In addition, I retained Mr. Fernandez to represent me on a limited civil case in
which I was granted a $5,000.00 judgment. Mr. Fernandez failed to file the judgment
with the court and to date I have received nothing of that judgment. He refused to assist
me with this, claiming he was too busy with my trial. Mr. Fernandez claimed to have
filed a motion that this case be considered “Complex”, yet what was presented to my
family and me at trial proved to be no more than Fraud.

I trust that you will review the information I have provided in this letter in good
faith. To speak plainly, a grievous wrong has been made and I am committed to putting
this right.

I appreciate your assistance, and look forward to a speedy response.


Linda Cator

EDITOR’S NOTE: Anarchadia is gonzo journalism, we’re not here to prove anything, but remember these acts were committed during the Bush era, two years after 9/11. Clinton when Governor of Arkansas was witnessed getting drugs smuggled into the country by plane, there is still an unsolved murder, because someone witnessed it. And these arab, maybe Kuwaiti men, might have been the lower beasts of the operation, but corruption is everywhere, and always looks the same. Top United Nations officials were caught doing the same thing a few years back, in Eastern Russia, during the Bush Administration as well. No surprise, vote in corrupt officials, and they’re going to take full advantage of immunity and power. And I’m sure they have good people they have run around following false leads, like Scott Shaw, who has served for the U.S Government for over 20 years for the U.S Government, and who is more than certain that Linda is not a conspiracy theorist:

Following the events of 9/11, I was assigned to the Los Angeles Police Department’s Anti-Terrorist Division where I assisted in complex criminal investigations conducted by the Los Angeles County Joint Terrorism Task Force, of individuals involved in the
submission of capped, false, and fraudulent insurance claims with suspected links to Terrorist.

I was assigned by the National Insurance Crime Bureau to the Eurasian Organized Crime Task Force where I assisted task force members in the investigation of complex conspiracies to commit insurance frauds, other financial crimes, and crimes of violence by
members of Eastern European Organized Crime Groups.

I have been an Investigator in the State of California in excess of 20 years. During my tenure, I have interviewed hundreds of individuals involved in all aspects of the fraudulent claim process, other financial crimes, illegal narcotic activities, and crimes of violence.

CIA Behind 2012 French Presidential Coup

May 9, 2012 in Uncategorized

“A Turkish newspaper urged that the United States be listed in Guinness Book of World Records as the Country with the Most Foreign Interventions.”

The 2012 french elections were rigged, censored, and manipulated. Nicolas Sarcozy had been spotted before the elections buying a house in the Hamptons; which proves that the french ruling elite had already changed their minds to whom their “guy” was going to be this time. The French and International Mainstream Media completely censored several other candidates as they always do, particularly a french comic, who is known for calling these past decades of French politics “a constantly encouraged hymn towards fascism”.  That is what our elites love to do, keep us guessing while we run like mice through their mazed contraptions. And you cannot blame them, it is their instinct to survive, it just so happens that they force their instinct on everyone else through fascism against the poor.

Since C.I.A Sarcozy came into power, the mainstream media had been portraying France as this homophobic nation full of nationalists. But in reality, when 500 homophobes in France would get together it made front page news around the world. Yet protests of 500,000 staging protests simultaneously against austerity measures imposed by the E.U, barely even get mentioned in the local media. France is an anarchist nation since Mikhail Bakunin, and the same corporations that funded Hitler and Stalin are doing everything in their power to get nazi sympathy in France back. Communist as well. I went to a socialist university in France jam packed with anarchist haters (communists, nazis), and they were renting out space to this corporation that was developing photo face recognition software for the modern global Gestapo. 3 of the so called activists at that school even knew it existed, and they thought it was good for them… statists!

The big problem you see is this, Francois Hollande and Nicolas Sarcozy were part of the same think tank “Le Siecle” ( which already has a bad reputation and many people in it with bad reputations). Francois’s wife worked for Bolloré, one of the most influential families in France. Nicolas Sarcozy was also Berlusconi’s lawyer in the 1980’s and was a personal friend of both Berlusconi and Putin. This helps understand why Sarcozy rebuilt/privatized the non-existent French military in support of NATO, so that America could justify internationally having gone to Afghanistan and Iraq. Psyops programs were started in Germany and France to turn public opinion towards supporting George Bush’s imperialist war. Remember when Sarcozy and Bush went on a boat ride? Or do you remember how cozy Bush and Blair’s relationship was (Polanski made a movie about it, and you saw what happened to him)?

This was our icon on Facebook for over 2 years, and Facebook recently deleted it saying it was breaching their terms of engagement. If it is, that means that Facebook’s terms of engagement are against freedom of speech.

And with all this information of course you could argue that conflict of interest in the 21st Century is so common and normal. And some will even go even further, because they are so brainwashed; they will inadvertently say that conflict of interest should stay legal for some of the world’s wealthiest and most sophisticated mass murderers, who manipulate elections around the World, in support of private corporate interests. Is it? Because that sort of entangled mainstream rhetoric sure was paid for by some sophisticated S.O.Bs.

Conflict of interest might have been uncommon, if the U.S had not already intervened in European elections many times before, and hadn’t already supported right-wing fascists like the FN’s Lepen family (who helped serve as a tool to bring France more towards accepting corporate fascism as did the fascist party of Russia). The CIA has supported other well known fascists including Berlusconi, and Putin’s only competition the fascist party itself (there is no difference between Putin and the russian fascist party, if you noticed they always vote and support the same political objectives, those of the upper class). Signor Putin, is beyond any doubt a CIA asset, who is trying to bring Russia into NATO in order to “fight” against the “Axis of evil”, or pretend to and then act as though they brought peace, instead of more profits to their pockets.

The very definition of right wing is this ( many people these last decades pretended to be on either side of the political spectrum, but who are actually beyond any doubt right wing pions):

“ In politics, the Right, right-wing and rightist has been defined as the support or acceptance of social hierarchy.”

Let us try and see if this rule applies:
Hitler?… Definitely a Social Hierarchist… therefore right-wing
Stalin?… Definitely a Social Hierarchist… therefore right-wing
Bush?… Definitely a Social Hierarchist… therefore right-wing
Ayatollah of Iran?… Definitely a Social Hierarchist… therefore right-wing
King of Saudi Arabia?… Definitely a Social Hierarchist… therefore right-wing
Sarcozy?… Definitely a Social Hierarchist… therefore right-wing
“Le Siecle?…. Definitely for Social Hierarchism… therefore right-wing
Obama?… Definitely a Social Hierarchist… therefore right-wing
U.K Monarchy?… for Social Hierarchism… therefore right-wing
Leader of the D.P.R.K?…. Definitely a Social Hierarchist… therefore right-wing
Napoleon?…. Definitely a Social Hierarchist… therefore right-wing
Roman Empire?… Definitely for Social Hierarchism.. therefore right-wing

Which proves my point, that all true leftist defenders have been murdered for thousands of years, by social hierarchists who always indoctrinated the poor into believing that hierarchist/elitist systems (while being on top, and self-proclaiming people intelligent or not), were good. Why were so many poor people murdered all throughout history? So that a few people could manipulate everyone else? Doesn’t seem very intelligent, and definitely not a good way to make sure monetary inequality doesn’t occur. Robin Hood wasn’t written yesterday. And neither was Oliver Twist, the history of Diogenes of Sinope, or all those other anarchist spirits who have been black-holed from history, simply because they were against helping social hierarchists manipulate those who had nothing, time and time again, for thousands of years.



A French website recently stated that Sarcozy was a pion for the CIA, since the website has been deleted and all of their links are now dead.

François Hollande Nicolas Sarkozy… both in the same club “Le Siecle ” …. with the likes of Édouard de Rothschild … socialist my ASS!….

The two names are in sequence in the section “personnalités politiques”: “

What Is Europe’s Problem?

February 9, 2012 in Uncategorized

‎” It starts with “thou shall not kill”, then it is “thou shall not kill your neighbor”, then  “thou shall not kill if that person has lots of money and resources to corrupt you”… and it finishes with, “God is with us, we can go and invade Iraq!”
– Christophe Alévêque

Many of us are too busy putting up with new false ideologies, mass media disinformation, as well as our own lives, to be able to discern real information from that which is false. There is also the national versus global “problem” (countries don’t necessarily share the same News, even though they all belong to the same companies, through advertising and financing), which technically censors non-corporate mass communication and still divides the world, between mass monetarism and non-monetarism (I assure you, it even divides China). It’s all much more subtle now, because obviously the criminals of today, have had a lot of homework to study up on… and so do we!

Europe is being divided just as America, Russia, China, and mostly every other developed country in the world; except in America we are one of the least educated Countries in the World, so truth easily wears thin, and debilitates public opinion to the point of supporting the most phony crooks this World has ever set eyes on. Some say fascism regained its power when Allen Dulles (a Nazi Supporter) assassinated Kennedy, after getting fired by Kennedy. Dulles surprisingly got his job back after Kennedy was killed, was on the Commission which investigated Kennedy, and helped start the career of George W. Bush. Others will argue that fascism never left America, since the early days of Henry Ford (a nazi supporter). I personally think that fascism is just a tool of all oligarchs, whether they be monarchs or the very rich hiding behind their corporations, trademarks, and monetary opportunists. Monarchies and corporations function the same way… they are trademarks, backed by capital interest. When the english people speak about their monarchy, they glorify it as an “amazing” trademark, which is good for stability… give me a break! They are just as amazing as Nike, who exploited enslaved children for 0.30 cents a pair of shoes, to then tell the World how much money they were making. “Amazing”!

The British Monarchy as well as the austrian monarchy were fascist at some point, and some of them fully supported the Nazis. Edward VIII had to be abdicated because he was a strong public supporter of Hitler. But nothing was said about George VI, and his personal ideologies. We can give them the benefit of believing in their personalized stochastic versions of History, or we can maybe imagine that the U.K monarchy had to turn against fascism. Fascism was unpopular in the U.K as well as the U.S (maybe because the money making war profit machine had already started). Hitler never bombed the british monarchy, he said it was just to scare the monarchs, but Fascism would have been advantageous to the already rottingly corrupt monarchy, its aristocracy and bourgeoisie (remember Charles Dickens?).

Unspun News On Facebook Since 2010

Maybe this sudden change in monarchs, had more to do with the “Business plan” in America which failed in 1933, and gave force to the war loving FDR. The U.K knew that if America ever went to War against UK monarchist fascism (as was the spanish monarchy, backed by the Vatican, and Italian Government), the Monarchy would be obliterated by historical American sentiment against the U.K crown. Strong feelings die hard. MI6 and the CIA might state a different story, but we all know who MI6 works for, as well as the CIA: corporate interest (not for the little guys and girls).

So in all this there is a trend, and even if we cannot prove it through judicial paper work (since America invented the paper shredder), maybe we can at least admit that the wealthy have been systemically greedy, as some public schools used to teach our kids (with Buddha, Robin Hood and Charles Dickens… the big movie studios are even going to capitalize on Dickens again, as did Sir. Charles for this year’s Charles Dickens anniversary).

Just keep in mind that fascism resurfaced right after WWII, with the CIA backing right-wing movements, while discrediting those on the Left (Hitler had done the exact same thing, when he won the elections of 1933). Here specialists will iterate the communist threat, except that Hitler was just as much against communism as America was before/after World War II. What is the primordial difference between fascism and communism? None. Both were populist fronts used to sell weapons and make war. These governments might have supported a few good ideas we can learn from, but they were just as murderous and opportunistic when it came to money as the fascists were. In principle, socialism/christianity was for equality, and against monetary inequality, while fascism is very much like anarcho-capitalism aspires to be today (the rich do as they please, which has been the case of socialist governments as well as christian institutions, the same can be said about Islam or any other Religion; they were all corrupted at some point or another by capitalism).

Propaganda Due which existed from 1945-1976 helped Italy’s right-wing pulverize the left from 1976 to 1981, Propaganda Due implicates three international celebrities: Berlusconi, Sarcozy (who was his Lawyer), and Putin, who just like George Bush, must have been CIA assets, or at least on the same side (that of fascism ever since Dulles, and maybe even before). The CIA also backed right-wing coups with the Hollywood style Italian Elections of 1948.

Anyway let us skip forward to today. What do Merkel, Sarcozy, Berlusconi, Obama, George Bush, Margaret Thatcher, Reagan, etc… all share in common? They support the right-wing, and are simply centrist populist opportunists, who work for the corporations, who in turn, work for the very rich (who puppeteer us all, it is the case of saying it, just look how old the British monarchy’s family lineage is, these folks had to lie out of their asses ). Never forget that the Austrian Monarchy taught the U.K monarchy not to go too far in the age of popular votes. The U.K fascists had learned from their ancestors mistakes, and were in full throttle to export it to America.

Angela Merkel and Sarcozy have been floating around together these last few months, on televisions saying the same thing: “More austerity, cut public sector jobs”. They state that they are even ready to kick out Greece and Portugal from the E.U because of their own fascism. And if anyone criticizes them, they say they are being affronted by the threats of nationalist/fascists. Maybe on TV those repeated lies work, but not near any critical-thinking minority (not all people have the time to identify when they are being lead into fascism, no matter how rich and innocent they are, because fascists talked about the poor all of the time, only to tax them more like they want to do on us today), enslave them, kill, ex-propriate and famish others. You know the drill! Its a natural recurrence in man, its fascism!

Therefore when these Countries talk about Greece and Portugal’s debt (behind their backs on mainstream corporate networks), the fascists want to kick out countries who refuse to remove more of their public sector. They always have wanted to replace public services with privatization and big chain hotels, which will impoverish them. America used those policies these past 40 years and look at use we are the most indebted country in the world). While the E.U is ready to allow countries like Croatia (which is an expensive tourist trap compared to Greece), into its fascist union. The European Bank is centralized just like the FED, and even if these unions broke up, it would actually make prices cheaper, while expanding the black and grey Market profits for those who can invest in them. It is common knowledge that those who invest in war get very rich.

And to conclude this rather long debacle I would like to speak of my opinion about France, since many countries in Europe, Eurasia, South America, and Africa are facing the same threat:

The only reason Sarcozy is even credited as a good candidate, is because his only “real” competition is the Fascist Party itself. Same in Russia against Putin, America with Rand Paul/Ron Paul (currently Obama but he doesn’t have the popular support anymore), and et cetera. Anarchists all over the world are censored, even for what they have to say. Simply because true wnarchism is not for profit, it is a revolutionary evolution within the psyche of mankind, and has been around for thousands of years… which is a very different image from what most history books state. Anarchists are simply minorities who speak out not behind an ideology, but against oppression they themselves felt. Most anarchists are pacifists, and are much more patient and peaceful than any of your government leaders or their bankers. Truth is not that difficult to find, unless you have Julius Caesar types who think they can redominate this World, with “divide and conquer”. Divide and conquer works, but it needs war to kill competition, or else it is quickly attacked as a deceitful lie. And people in this world are sick and tired of seeing people dying and hungry, just so that a few assholes can take the credit for everything their billions of slaves have made.

‎” Religion is like any elite. You have the pope, who declares something. The Apostles listen and go out repeating the declaration of the pope, which they memorized. Then you have what is called the people of the church, who interpret what the Apostles told them, but still it is always memorized. Finally you have the “believers” (who ironically believe not what they have to say, but what they themselves memorized, courtesy of the church), who go out and indoctrinate people who have no means to think, like most of us (only because we are worked so much we are stupid and lower class, and must have nothing better to do). So then these stupid people are convinced that it is wise to repeat what they heard from “believers”. Those same “believers”, who had memorized what the Apostles said, who in turn had to memorize what the Pope declared. ”
– Christophe Alévêque

The Truth About Ron Paul

December 10, 2011 in Uncategorized

WARNING: Due to the Highly Controversial Nature of this article, it is recommended that you do not read this article, if you have a hard time accepting original ideas. The truth can hurt you, but it can also set you free:

‎” A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant and the crazy crazier. ”

– H. L. Mencken

When I was 20, I used to take Infowars as a serious source. I do remember thinking it was quite peculiar that such anti-Americanism, could be handled by Americans; especially during the whole Bush Oppression Era, and the 9/11 Patriots (waving their flags, as though

they were Roman spectators cheering for the hungry Lions, to be brought into the arena). Then the Tea Party started, and Sarah Palin, and they were all over America. And when Alex Jones started supporting the Tea Party, along with Jesse Ventura, with his whole “don’t tread on me ” all endorsed by the Koch Brothers; I started to realize that Alex Jones could not be a credible source. Alex Jones and his WWF “truther buddies” were part of some bigger conspiracy, involved in misinforming the American Public.

Recently, I started to get a much clearer idea of what was really happening, in America. It all started when Ron Paul supporters started declaring that Ron Paul was being  censored by Fox News. But that wasn’t at all true. Facebook is clogged with Ron Paul propaganda, and there are many videos on Youtube, of Ron Paul going on Fox multiple times over the past years. We can easily argue that Fox News gave Dr. Paul more air time than a lot of people Fox really does censor, like the son of a 9/11 victim; who was told by Bill O’reilly to shut up, for thinking that maybe 9/11 had been done by more nefarious interests. Otherwise it is obvious that he has had more air time than say, Jon Stewart. Which was another false debate, since Bill O’reilly and Jon Stewart both support Israel’s Oppression on Palestine.

So I started to do a little research on Dr. Paul. If you pay attention, and try to look beyond his words, you find that he has the same backings as Obama did before being elected. It is almost the same campaign, but this time Ron Paul the outcast, has become an American hero over night.

The first thing to know about Ron Paul, is that he has big investments with Barracks Gold, which has big plans for Corporate Exploitation in the future. Dr. Paul also has similar views as famous demagogue Republican Presidents such as George Bush and Ronald Reagan. They all share the same view on abortion , and having the same adoration for Neo-Liberalism and Free Market Catastrophies. Dr. Paul is for private schooling, just like Obama, and his Chartered Schools program. While American Public schools closed down Nationwide, due to bankrupted states. But what surprised me the most, was that he has most of the American Military on his side.  Obama shares that with him it makes a lot of votes (with the phantasmal idea that he is for peace, while allowing a war, like say the Iraq War, to sail on past 2010). Ron Paul has a lot of citizen donations for his campaign and has been clamored for it, does that ring a bell (Obama voted by the people gimmick they gave us). Obviously, if his Public Relations campaign was to fool America, he is pushing all of the right buttons. His son Rand Paul is also, known for having a Neo-nazi leaning ideology. Not to mention the fact that being a Christian Anarchist, and Capitalist Anarchist, is completely oxymoronic.

As an American it is important to ask all of these questions. These people are the mass opinion makers, and ideology manipulators of our age, for the masses. If we all truly want a better World, these tough questions need to be asked. Otherwise we are no better than Americans who believed the Fox News Live Demolition of the World Trade Center. Or better yet, go to War against innocent people, only to allow profit for a few very rich conscienceless corporate profiteers. And if that is the case, they are ready to wage war against our minds. Take Alex Jones and his recent FEMA camps and Money Bomb attempts. Everything about FEMA camps comes from the Info Wars network of blogs and websites, and all Alex Jones does is cite himself. At least back in the day, you could find interesting articles, and some unspun information

But I think there is something deeper, and darker in all of this thought. It is the fact that Ron Paul, Alex Jones et Company, want to stop money and go back to gold. With an Anarcho-Capitalist philosphy, dreamed of by the brutalist Dictators which in the long run develop 3rd World Countries, just take the Taliban. They anarchistically kill for money, right?

There is also the fact, that Gold is not a renewable resource, and less and less of it. Before we know it we will be living in Corporate Feudalism again, such as 19th Century England. If anything this, sounds like Agenda 21; the Agenda which Alex Jones is so fearful of, and which fuels his daily Christian Jihad.

I always thought watching his shows that Alex Jones dreamed of being Hitler when he was a child, so this all might just very much resembles a veritable Christian Conspiracy to recreate Fascism in America. Ron Paul wants to secure our borders, like Hitler wanted to secure his Nazi Nation. And he has a lot of moronic friends, who would love to do the same. They are all very rich. And there is something Ron Paul never mentions. Since the 1970’s when Nixon created the first private Hospital Kaiser Permanente, the Republican Party has been hacking away at America’s Public Health Care. They obviously got very rich, building private Hospitals. But it especially tarnished the Medical establishment. Poor people no longer received the same treatment as the rich.

So if America does end up privatizing Public Education and the works. “ It will be the poor who will pay the most, as always.” (The same words uttered by Dominique Strauss Kahn, months before being sent to Riker’s Prison).

After 2001, the price of Gold dropped considerably, and ever since it has sky rocketed. If Gold were to become or back U.S currency, Corporations could buy up most of it, and citizens would quickly lose their rights, their purchasing power, and the same problems as the Middle-Ages would quickly resurface. Greedy religious Corporatized Kingdoms await us. Let us never forget that Hitler was a Christian, and that if anyone had bothered to study “Mein Kampf” before he was elected, they might have noticed that he wanted to exterminate poor people and radicals such as the Freemasons, Anarchists, and Communists.  The same people Alex Jones calls “the Illuminati” and “Zionists”. Zionism is really just a way to keep old religions alive, so that Wars can still be profited from, without too much public discontent. Zionism was after all, the fuel for Judeo-Christian/Catholic War rhetoric throughout History.

In the end this is all Demagogy and superfluous. We are being constantly divided and conquered, in order to force us to walk in line. Therefore, whether Ron Paul be a saint or not (or all these thoughts above be untrue, and only wood to burn for the Obama’s 2012 campaign), I strongly suggest that anyone who believes in Democracy, not vote. Occupy the voting booths and tell people not to vote. There is much which needs to be investigated, and the people must take that power back, since the Government can no longer offer us stability and justice. Obama is no better, and America is being lead to chose from many candidates; but they are all opportunists, trying to get big Hollywood weddings for their children Hillary Clinton style, in order to immortalize, their pathetic little egocentricities. In the end it’s all about money, greed and power. It always was, and it always will be. And only hypocritical Christians, can keep going on with this sort of maniacal obsession. Jesus Christ was put on a cross and killed, because he saw how money corrupted the world around him.

So if your goal,  is just to perpetuate Nations which build themselves around money and the cross; well then you perpetuatethe lives of little children who can kill, but not face the truth. Money is a drug, and it facilitates corruption, oppression and mass murder.


‎” For a person to believe a plane made of aluminum filled with kerosine, can strike a concrete, steel building, that stands 1368 feet tall and drop it as dust. They should have their head examined. To believe it happened twice is a joke. A cartoon. Then 5:00 47 story building 7 drops like a rock. Aliens? Please give me a break. ” – Clifford Driver




” The CIA has been known to pay off the Alex Jones radio show for spreading laughable conspiracies which disarm public suspicion in regards to the failures of FEMA after hurricane Katrina. ” – Internet Chronicle

‎” If you like Ron Paul so much. You should move to his district. I lived there for 5 years right down the street from Captain 1984. A joint can get you 5 years there. Dow Chemical poisons everything unchecked, the poverty level is one of the highest (as well as teen pregnancy) in the US. It’s like a corporate run 3rd world country. ” – Sam Barnett




A Conversation With The Renown Noam Chomsky About 9/11

December 5, 2011 in Uncategorized

A Conversation With The Renown Noam Chomsky: The Truth Movement and Sept. 11

Anarchadia: Do you see a link between Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood which has been considered in retrospect as manipulated by western interests to destabilize the Middle East?


Noam Chomsky: I don’t know of any evidence for a relation, and I’d be cautious about the term “destabilize.” It’s a term of imperialism. Thus Obama praises the brutal dictator Mubarak because he “stabilizes” Egypt, and opposes the Muslim brotherhood because they are calling for democratic elections, in which they are likely to do well, thus “destabilizing” Egypt.

Anarchadia: What is your opinion on this quote: “Nor was that all. Sound beatings of the Moslem Brotherhood organizers who had been arrested revealed that the organization had been thoroughly penetrated, at the top, by the British, American, French and Soviet intelligence services, any one of which could either make active use of it or blow it up, whichever best suited its purposes. Important lesson: fanaticism is no insurance against corruption; indeed, the two are highly compatible.” Quote from Miles Axe Copeland, Jr. “The Game of Nations: The Amorality of Power Politics, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1970” .

Noam Chomsky: Miles Copeland is not very reliable.

Anarchadia: Well neither is Obama, but sometimes the pieces fit together. I mean true, this sort of mentality benefits the Islamists, Chinese and Russians… but was it not this sort of meandering from the projected truth about Vietnam, which woke us from the extreme anti-communist fervor the American populace had been living in for the last 20 or 30 years?

Radical HateNoam Chomsky: On Vietnam, the meandering was towards reliable fact and understanding. Takes better evidence than this, in my opinion.

Anarchadia: It is harder to have reliable facts today, because everything which is factual and needs to stay a secret, is marginalized. The first thing you said about Copeland, was that he was unreliable. But, if you take the true nature of anyone, everyone is unreliable, right?

Noam Chomsky: It’s true that quantum physics is not 100% reliable, nor is astrology. But there is a difference. Afraid I don’t follow the rest.

Anarchadia: It is my opinion that marginalization is a weapon for keeping things on the down low. If you take three specialists, from different parts of the world, let’s say: Iran, U.K and Israel, all three will come up with different conclusions while looking at the same facts. Yet the one who is backed by the interests that be, will be the person who is considered most linear (on the mainstream level). Do you have any comments on this?

Noam Chomsky: I’ve written extensively on these matters, and don’t have much to add. We know that outside of narrow areas of logic and mathematics, nothing can be definitively proven. From that fact deeply confused post-modernists go off into fantasies about conflicting narratives, no truth, etc. In fact, it’s been understood for centuries that we can make sensible (if not certain) judgments quite often – about the matters you mention, for example. On Wikileaks, if you read yesterday’s newspapers you can see that the main thrust was interpreted differently in the NYT and the London Financial Times, the world’s leading business daily. That’s fairly systematic, and understandable, a tiny example of what I and others have documented in great detail. The US-UK coup in Iran was not only known at once, but celebrated in the press – the NY Times, for example. I’ve often quoted it. Some take the Warren Commission as accurate, many question elements of it, or even all of it. That has nothing to do with the question of general significance: was there a high-level conspiracy with policy consequences? To that the answer is: No, with very high probability, a matter that I’ve written about in detail. The Truth Movement receives unusually high publicity as contrasted with genuine activist critique of state crimes. Simply compare Griffin’s exposure on CSPAN, etc., to that of activist dissenters. The reason may be that it Is welcomed by power systems, much as JFK conspiracy theories have been (as we know from internal documents), because it diverts energy and attention from ongoing crimes of state. If he or anyone could present a coherent account of what they think happened, one that is not undermined by the most elementary considerations, I – and I suppose others – would pay some attention to it. I was closely involved with leaking the Pentagon Papers, and am very glad they came out, but in fact they had almost no impact on the decisions by the business world and the government to slowly withdraw from Vietnam, which had already been taken. A great deal is indeed marginalized. I’ve written thousands of pages on the topic, as have others. But I think you are ignoring the most significant examples and keeping to some which, while fashionable, are not of much importance.

Anarchadia: I absolutely see what you mean. I am 23 years old and not as informed, but I try to be. I am a constant activist, and am outraged by the indecency with which law abiding citizens are treated (protest parks, ultrasounds, escrow police spying and dressing up imitating violent activists such as the black blocks, heavy armor, gas, etc…). Democracy is being sold off to private contractors, and we protest to no avail (France). I also see what you mean when you say that the truth movement is somewhat cathartic: The Truth Movement has a tendency to lure people towards the Tea Party which has been very highly publicized, and even clamored by the crooks over at Fox News. Example: Alex Jones has a tendency to be able to explain things that other Media Organizations can’t (I am a very rational person and definitely see through Infowars political and advertising strategies, which are populist sometimes and very far from fact). Yet, the Infowars website surprises me from time to time with a decent sourced article; but then, Alex Jones goes on to supporting the tea party and the terror advertisers who advertise on the Infowars website. Have you heard of Alex Jones?

Noam Chomsky: I don’t know much about Jones. The little I’ve seen, not enough for a serious judgment, seemed to be pretty wild. On 9/11, the coincidences, etc., may seem remarkable, but they are normal. Look at any complex historical event through a microscope, and that’s what you’ll find, even breaches of security that go far beyond 9/11 in significance. E.g., it was just revealed that Clinton lost the code that authorizes launching nukes, which means that for four months, the USSR could have launched a surprise attack, destroying the US, with complete impunity. A few years ago a nuclear-armed bomber flew across the country, violating the highest security controls. A malfunction could have destroyed most of the country. Etc. That’s why scientists do experiments instead of studying videotapes of what’s happening outside the window. It’s why historians hotly debate events that have been intensively studied. The TMers do not seem to understand the nature of evidence – and also, do not understand why they are laboring to show that Saddam or bin Laden was responsible for 9/11, inadvertently of course. That requires following a simple argument. Your hypothesis that the Bush administration knew about 9/11 but didn’t try to stop it is weak enough so that the evidence is almost irrelevant. But it still assumes that they are utter lunatics, or else they would have blamed it on Iraqis, not Saudis, as has been pointed out over and over. I’m afraid your other assertions vanish in much the same way as these, or what you claimed about concealing the Iranian coup, when subjected to scrutiny. If you’d like to believe these things, that’s your business. But if you want anyone to take your speculations seriously, you’ll have to make a case. I’ve written about most of the matters you mention.

What you say has shreds of truth. Thus, of course the US had oil in mind in invading Iraq (and was compelled to abandon its major war aims in this respect, as we have seen). The concept “false flag” has become popular with the TM, who uses it in ways that make it almost meaningless. Of course governments invent ways to frighten populations into obedience to pursue aims of dominant power centers. We hardly need these rather random speculations to establish that. It’s topic of extensive serious work.

Anarchadia: I admit, every point I’ve tried to make has for the most part been an assertion. Scrutiny is what keeps my opinions objective. I don’t pretend to know the truth behind these events, but I have an insatiable need for truth, and am always searching for it. On the – Clinton losing the code incident – don’t you find this story is politically motivated? To release such information, especially today when America is positioning itself against China and Russia? This seems like they are inciting fear into the American mind (again) about: “what if Russia (China, Iran) attacked us”. I find it insane how much war fomentation is going on these days. The Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is an Ex-CEO of one of the largest military contractors in America and abroad, I mean talk about conflict of interest (they sold weapons to Taiwan against China’s firm request not to, that is a direct breach of National Security). Democracy has been taken hostage by military profiteers, pharmaceutical/chemical corporations, big banks and their arm of hijacked government the Federal Reserve (whoever can pay for the expensive campaigns and shoes of opportunists such as Sarah Palin). Political prostitution is at an all time high. So when you say that there is a very small chance that 9/11 was caused by western interests I have to disagree. If you look at any complex situation through a microscope you can also get lost in the complexity. “Tout est relatif”. This goes both ways. When you talk about the Bush Family as lunatics, I disagree; I see them as somewhat intelligent. They know exactly what they are doing. And why they are doing it. I met Carla Del Ponte last year here in Lyon, France, and she talked about her meeting with President Bush (when she was trying to get war criminals of the former Yugoslavia extradited). She says he seemed very concerned in person and said “Carla I will personally look into this, I promise”. She never heard from him again. This I think clearly depicts a very good liar instead of the stupid yet powerful imbecile of a president everyone has been making him out to be. His father was the head of the CIA. That is a very strong asset. The U.N has also been hijacked by political prostitutes and we live in a far more nefarious world than the transparent one you tend to proclaim when assertions are made about 9/11, Kennedy, etc… The internal organization in charge of supervising the U.N has been suspended since 2009. Surely this is more important than an idiotic playboy president like Clinton losing the Nuclear codes? I mean after all it is people who invest their pride on this logic and transparency you talk about, who voted for Clinton. Surely there is a reason why Wikileaks has published more scoops than the New York Times has in a decade? What is your opinion on movements who are for auditing the FED and the the DOD? Also, those who are against organizations such as Bilderberg (and their claims that Obama secretly went to a meeting with Hillary Clinton)?

Noam Chomsky: You misunderstood. I didn’t talk of the Bush family as lunatics. You did. More precisely, as I wrote, that is what follows from your speculations. Who do you propose to audit the DOD and the Fed? It would be amazing if Obama hadn’t met Clinton, and why should it be advertised? There’s no known significance to Bilderberg apart from the fact that rich and powerful people like to get together. Can’t comment on the rest. By that kind of reasoning one can reach any conclusion. These are not what count as evidence and argument, in any form of rational inquiry.

Of course you don’t believe that Bush is a lunatic. Rather, the theory you proposed implied that he is a lunatic. One of many reasons why it’s hard to take the TM seriously. Nothing wrong with a civilian audit, but such proposals require mass popular support. To recapitulate, I pointed out that the theories proposed by the TM, and your much weaker one too, implied that the Bush administration were all lunatics; not just Bush the individual, but all of the planners. I’m glad we agree that the conclusion is unacceptable. It therefore follows that all the theories are too…

NOTE: After having spoken to Noam Chomsky about September 11 and the Truth Movement, I was more lost than ever: how can such a brilliant man (who I agree with on so many levels) be so opposed to a theory like 9/11 is an inside job? Is the movement and its abundant flux of information truly discreditable? OR has the mainstream media discredited so many points and used such strong rhetoric of ridicule towards TM that even intellectuals such as Noam Chomsky can’t believe it? I got the impression that Chomsky just hasn’t really looked into the facts about Sept. 11, simply because of all the false facts TM has incorporated into its rhetoric (which are easily exploitable by the spin doctors). I noticed that the media never directly discredited the TM. They acted as though it were of minor interest and could discredit itself. It can! Like the Norman Mineta video: if watched in full it is completely insync with Cheney’s story (there are a few mistakes but not enough for indictment). So if there is a conspiracy behind September 11 Noam Chomsky is right about the fact that whoever orchestrated the event was very intelligent, and to solve the puzzle it will take true intellect and hard work to crack. But now that it has been discredited, we must become very careful: it took years to popularize the notion that Pearl Harbor was a false flag attack and we still don’t truly know for Kennedy (although in my opinion the event was very suspicious). If George Bush Sr. and his entourage got away with the assassination of a U.S president, then yes, Bush Sr. was definitely not a lunatic!

How To Prepare For WW3

June 30, 2015 in

Anarchist Timeline


Rules applicable to U.S. servicemen and women and prisoners of war:

Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. § 920), to which essentially only members of the United States Armed Services and enemy prisoners of war are subject, defines the age of consent as sixteen years in subsection but allows an exemption for people who are married to minors 12–15 years old. There is also a mistake in age defense if the minor is over 12, but not if the minor is under 12. Within the United States, United States servicemembers are further subject to the local state law both when off-post. The local state law is incorporated, for the most part, into federal law when on-post per the Assimilative Crimes Act (18 U.S.C. § 13). Depending upon the relevant status of forces agreement, United States servicemembers are also subject to the local criminal laws of the host nation for acts committed off-post.



We’re Back…

June 13, 2015 in

GCHQWelcome back. After more than a year of interruption, we are back to deliver you a brand new podcast. This episode covers many things such as Internet Censorship, the Great Pillage of Native Americans, and other such interesting topics. Please stay tuned for our next podcast, and thank you for tuning in, tuning out.


” Facebook and Google contributed more to monitoring Americans, than all other sources combined, and cheaper, too.” – Director of the CIA

2014 – Biggest Genocide In Human History

April 10, 2014 in Uncategorized

Every 5 years the global elite has starved to death approx. 54,750,000 people for corporate profit increases made from false food and resource scarcity. Here is the math:

16,000 children starve to death every day + 14,000 adults (approx.) = 30,000 x 365 = 10,950,000 x 5 = 54,750,000

That is more people than Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and George Bush combined; also consider the fact that it sure ain’t poor people who can afford their own slavery. Therefore it is safe to assume that the same global elite fund all these fascist slave regimes all over the planet, making our current elite the most spoiled, genocidal, and least responsible of them all. And it’s not like we don’t have the technology to solve these problems peacefully, except who wants peace and equality, when the promise of having billions of slaves is right in front of you?

Jeff Rothschild

Jeff Rothschild is a libertarian in San Francisco, atheist in LA, anarcho-capitalist in New York, communist in China, capitalist in Washington D.C, and secretly a big admirer of Hitler like Mark Zuckerberg.

This is the greatest genocide in human history, and the richest still are not satisfied, they now talk about the necessity of a third world war, where 90% of humanity needs to be executed. They fund NASA to create biased studies about how unsustainable life currently is, while blaming poor people (overpopulation) who have been sustainable for thousands of years. Obviously the current system is unsustainable, but genocide is no long term solution. They are plotting a third world war while currently killing off more people than ever in the past. When will this end??? After World War 3?

Historians beautify history with false heroics about their philanthropists (slave masters/financeers) and very few facts, but in reality, this planet is plagued (has been for thousands of years), with elitists who resolve all of humanity’s problems with blood shed and disinformation. They needed 7 billion blinded slaves to dig out all the riches, and now they don’t need them anymore. Like farmers who buy cats to kill rats, and then kill the cats when there are no more rats, to have to buy more cats when the rats come back, they keep selling us voodoo like the imperialists did to african tribesman; let us burn fake dolls of rich white people, while they kill us off with real life poverty, bullets and bombs.

In the past food scarcity happened because of too many war economies, or not enough food. Today we have plenty of war economies, and so much food, that rich people have to create false food scarcity to keep humanity enslaved. But enslavement is always followed with genocide, because rich people don’t want to pay back their slaves, at least not all of them. 54 million are killed just from starvation, not even mentioning fascist slave systems, wars, and having a global elite who feeds poor people cancer /death instead of heaven. Because you can’t sell for profit heaven, only hell! Ruining the only viable planet in the solar system for short term profits.

There are 1 planet and 3 moons in our solar system we could have been terraforming for human life since the 1990s, and our planet could already be entirely automized so that people wouldn’t need to do the slave work machines can do. This just proves that you can’t sell freedom, only slavery. Capitalism is communism for the rich, and money is national-socialism for the global elite. Call it what you will but this just proves that the only incentive money creates, is the one which makes people intellectually and physically lazy!


Jeff Rothschild Censors Civilians For The DOD


Rich Americans Are Being Armed

March 14, 2014 in Uncategorized

Rich americans are being armed and trained to kill poor peoplRich americans are being armed and trained to kill poor people, in order to more effectively silence them. Weapons are being stockpiled. More private prisons are being opened and lobbied for, in the country which has the biggest prison population per capita in the world. FEMA camps are also being used to house homeless people, while acting as though they are an emergency service to poor people. In a country which still sterilizes prison inmates, helps enforce the starvation of over 54 million people every 5 years for corporate profit increases, sells drugs to your children to keep them enslaved, rigs elections in over 190 countries including their own, censors / spies on thanks to CIABook and CIA Google over 1 billion people, creates viruses like H1N1 with big pharma funds (corporate welfware) and government funds (NATIONAL SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM), has over 5,000 military bases and covert operations in over 190 countries, and who goes all over the internet pretending as though 250,000 Iraqis were murdered instead of 2.5 million or that the US has 900 bases instead of 5000,  no one is safe.


Rich americans are being armed and trained to kill poor peopl



Free Energy Suppression

January 24, 2014 in Uncategorized

Free EnergyAccording to Wikipedia: “Free energy suppression (sometimes new energy suppression) is a conspiracy theory claiming that technologically viable, pollution-free, no-cost energy sources are being suppressed by governments, corporations, or advocacy groups.”

Now we have to remember that the U.S Government spends a lot of money and effort making sure Wikipedia is rigged, and not as democratic as we would imagine. For example, George Bush’s Wikipedia is constantly being beatified, while his family’s nazi involvement, CIA assassinations and genocides never get mentioned.

We all know that if ever Petrol could be replaced Halliburton’s fracking patents would be worthless, and the military would have a harder time creating high powered killing machines, not to save lives, but to expropriate poor people and cull them regularly.

Well it turns out the car that runs on water is not a myth, and Tesla was right: ” capitalism is anti-science “. Tesla would know he got exploited by Edison, and mocked by Einstein. Here is the video showing his car working perfectly, and even being tested by experts.

It costs 350$ to make your car run on water, Google: Pentone Motor.

YouTube Preview Image