What Is Europe’s Problem?

February 9, 2012 in Uncategorized

‎” It starts with “thou shall not kill”, then it is “thou shall not kill your neighbor”, then  ”thou shall not kill if that person has lots of money and resources to corrupt you”… and it finishes with, “God is with us, we can go and invade Iraq!”
- Christophe Alévêque

Many of us are too busy putting up with new false ideologies, mass media disinformation, as well as our own lives, to be able to discern real information from that which is false. There is also the national versus global “problem” (countries don’t necessarily share the same News, even though they all belong to the same companies, through advertising and financing), which technically censors non-corporate mass communication and still divides the world, between mass monetarism and non-monetarism (I assure you, it even divides China). It’s all much more subtle now, because obviously the criminals of today, have had a lot of homework to study up on… and so do we!

Europe is being divided just as America, Russia, China, and mostly every other developed country in the world; except in America we are one of the least educated Countries in the World, so truth easily wears thin, and debilitates public opinion to the point of supporting the most phony crooks this World has ever set eyes on. Some say fascism regained its power when Allen Dulles (a Nazi Supporter) assassinated Kennedy, after getting fired by Kennedy. Dulles surprisingly got his job back after Kennedy was killed, was on the Commission which investigated Kennedy, and helped start the career of George W. Bush. Others will argue that fascism never left America, since the early days of Henry Ford (a nazi supporter). I personally think that fascism is just a tool of all oligarchs, whether they be monarchs or the very rich hiding behind their corporations, trademarks, and monetary opportunists. Monarchies and corporations function the same way… they are trademarks, backed by capital interest. When the english people speak about their monarchy, they glorify it as an “amazing” trademark, which is good for stability… give me a break! They are just as amazing as Nike, who exploited enslaved children for 0.30 cents a pair of shoes, to then tell the World how much money they were making. “Amazing”!

The British Monarchy as well as the austrian monarchy were fascist at some point, and some of them fully supported the Nazis. Edward VIII had to be abdicated because he was a strong public supporter of Hitler. But nothing was said about George VI, and his personal ideologies. We can give them the benefit of believing in their personalized stochastic versions of History, or we can maybe imagine that the U.K monarchy had to turn against fascism. Fascism was unpopular in the U.K as well as the U.S (maybe because the money making war profit machine had already started). Hitler never bombed the british monarchy, he said it was just to scare the monarchs, but Fascism would have been advantageous to the already rottingly corrupt monarchy, its aristocracy and bourgeoisie (remember Charles Dickens?).

Unspun News On Facebook Since 2010

Maybe this sudden change in monarchs, had more to do with the “Business plan” in America which failed in 1933, and gave force to the war loving FDR. The U.K knew that if America ever went to War against UK monarchist fascism (as was the spanish monarchy, backed by the Vatican, and Italian Government), the Monarchy would be obliterated by historical American sentiment against the U.K crown. Strong feelings die hard. MI6 and the CIA might state a different story, but we all know who MI6 works for, as well as the CIA: corporate interest (not for the little guys and girls).

So in all this there is a trend, and even if we cannot prove it through judicial paper work (since America invented the paper shredder), maybe we can at least admit that the wealthy have been systemically greedy, as some public schools used to teach our kids (with Buddha, Robin Hood and Charles Dickens… the big movie studios are even going to capitalize on Dickens again, as did Sir. Charles for this year’s Charles Dickens anniversary).

Just keep in mind that fascism resurfaced right after WWII, with the CIA backing right-wing movements, while discrediting those on the Left (Hitler had done the exact same thing, when he won the elections of 1933). Here specialists will iterate the communist threat, except that Hitler was just as much against communism as America was before/after World War II. What is the primordial difference between fascism and communism? None. Both were populist fronts used to sell weapons and make war. These governments might have supported a few good ideas we can learn from, but they were just as murderous and opportunistic when it came to money as the fascists were. In principle, socialism/christianity was for equality, and against monetary inequality, while fascism is very much like anarcho-capitalism aspires to be today (the rich do as they please, which has been the case of socialist governments as well as christian institutions, the same can be said about Islam or any other Religion; they were all corrupted at some point or another by capitalism).

Propaganda Due which existed from 1945-1976 helped Italy’s right-wing pulverize the left from 1976 to 1981, Propaganda Due implicates three international celebrities: Berlusconi, Sarcozy (who was his Lawyer), and Putin, who just like George Bush, must have been CIA assets, or at least on the same side (that of fascism ever since Dulles, and maybe even before). The CIA also backed right-wing coups with the Hollywood style Italian Elections of 1948.

Anyway let us skip forward to today. What do Merkel, Sarcozy, Berlusconi, Obama, George Bush, Margaret Thatcher, Reagan, etc… all share in common? They support the right-wing, and are simply centrist populist opportunists, who work for the corporations, who in turn, work for the very rich (who puppeteer us all, it is the case of saying it, just look how old the British monarchy’s family lineage is, these folks had to lie out of their asses ). Never forget that the Austrian Monarchy taught the U.K monarchy not to go too far in the age of popular votes. The U.K fascists had learned from their ancestors mistakes, and were in full throttle to export it to America.

Angela Merkel and Sarcozy have been floating around together these last few months, on televisions saying the same thing: “More austerity, cut public sector jobs”. They state that they are even ready to kick out Greece and Portugal from the E.U because of their own fascism. And if anyone criticizes them, they say they are being affronted by the threats of nationalist/fascists. Maybe on TV those repeated lies work, but not near any critical-thinking minority (not all people have the time to identify when they are being lead into fascism, no matter how rich and innocent they are, because fascists talked about the poor all of the time, only to tax them more like they want to do on us today), enslave them, kill, ex-propriate and famish others. You know the drill! Its a natural recurrence in man, its fascism!

Therefore when these Countries talk about Greece and Portugal’s debt (behind their backs on mainstream corporate networks), the fascists want to kick out countries who refuse to remove more of their public sector. They always have wanted to replace public services with privatization and big chain hotels, which will impoverish them. America used those policies these past 40 years and look at use we are the most indebted country in the world). While the E.U is ready to allow countries like Croatia (which is an expensive tourist trap compared to Greece), into its fascist union. The European Bank is centralized just like the FED, and even if these unions broke up, it would actually make prices cheaper, while expanding the black and grey Market profits for those who can invest in them. It is common knowledge that those who invest in war get very rich.

And to conclude this rather long debacle I would like to speak of my opinion about France, since many countries in Europe, Eurasia, South America, and Africa are facing the same threat:

The only reason Sarcozy is even credited as a good candidate, is because his only “real” competition is the Fascist Party itself. Same in Russia against Putin, America with Rand Paul/Ron Paul (currently Obama but he doesn’t have the popular support anymore), and et cetera. Anarchists all over the world are censored, even for what they have to say. Simply because true wnarchism is not for profit, it is a revolutionary evolution within the psyche of mankind, and has been around for thousands of years… which is a very different image from what most history books state. Anarchists are simply minorities who speak out not behind an ideology, but against oppression they themselves felt. Most anarchists are pacifists, and are much more patient and peaceful than any of your government leaders or their bankers. Truth is not that difficult to find, unless you have Julius Caesar types who think they can redominate this World, with “divide and conquer”. Divide and conquer works, but it needs war to kill competition, or else it is quickly attacked as a deceitful lie. And people in this world are sick and tired of seeing people dying and hungry, just so that a few assholes can take the credit for everything their billions of slaves have made.

‎” Religion is like any elite. You have the pope, who declares something. The Apostles listen and go out repeating the declaration of the pope, which they memorized. Then you have what is called the people of the church, who interpret what the Apostles told them, but still it is always memorized. Finally you have the “believers” (who ironically believe not what they have to say, but what they themselves memorized, courtesy of the church), who go out and indoctrinate people who have no means to think, like most of us (only because we are worked so much we are stupid and lower class, and must have nothing better to do). So then these stupid people are convinced that it is wise to repeat what they heard from “believers”. Those same “believers”, who had memorized what the Apostles said, who in turn had to memorize what the Pope declared. ”
- Christophe Alévêque